Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14384
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, & A Cleaning LlGreen Cleaning, 1 Shipping and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Castelaz et al v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05713
Plaintiff:
Celia Castelaz, Brittanie Nalley, Northa Johnson and others
Defendant:
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics, Inc., Estee Lauder Inc. and others
Hernes v. Boone County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 3:2022cv50251
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Hernes
Defendant:
Boone County Adult Detention Facility and Bobby Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MCMULLEN et al
as 2:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
BOBBY BROWN
Defendant:
DAREK MCMULLEN and JEFFERY CREASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbie Brown v. USA
as 18-2768
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBIE BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brown v. Mayfield et al
as 4:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brown
Defendant:
. Mayfield, . Andersen, . Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Stenson et al
as 4:2018cv04071
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brown
Defendant:
D Stenson, Wanda Pennock, Shun Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04211
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brown
Defendant:
Greg Scott, Chris Clayton, Lynn Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Brown v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 17-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, JOE HANKINS, SHAN JUMPER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
