Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stone v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv04926
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Stone
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LONG et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02603
Defendant:
SUSIE CORDI, JOSEPH SIMPSON, ZACH ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv03129
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Defendant:
JASON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv03552
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA--MARION COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMOCK v. BASS & ASSOCIATES, PC
as 1:2016cv00798
Defendant:
BASS & ASSOCIATES, PC
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY SMOCK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01353
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LONG v. BALLARD et al
as 1:2012cv00569
Defendant:
GREG BALLARD, JOHN BARTH, VERNON BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LONG v. WHITE et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Defendant:
GREG BALLARD, LEE HOARD, JOHN AND JANE DOE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH TWO HUNDRED and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2010cv00172
Defendant:
MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, JULIE BEIGHLEY and DR. THOMAS WEBSTER
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY COLLINS
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, MICHAEL NALLEY, HELEN MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
