Cases 1 - 10 of 769
BRYANT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
COREY L. BRYANT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtz et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
James D Kurtz and Alisanny Montero
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, N7445 Racetrack Road and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dailey v. Arens et al
as 3:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Corey Dailey
Defendant:
. Arens, . Zanger, J Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sukalich v. Becerra et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Corey Paul Edward Sukalich
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Sukalich v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Corey Paul Edward Sukalich
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HYATT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07099
Plaintiff:
COREY HYATT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and COOK GROUP INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
