Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cintron, Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thom Howell v. Shawn Smith
as 16-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOM D. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN SMITH
Howell v. Highland Indiana Town of et al
as 2:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Thom D Howell
Defendant:
Highland Indiana Town of , Peter Hojnicki , Highland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Cook County, et al
as 1:2011cv04454
Plaintiff:
Jamal Smith
Defendant:
The County of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOWELL
as 2:2011cv00115
Defendant:
RAY D. HOWELL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Hudson v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2011cv01756
Plaintiff:
Tylon Hudson
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J Dart, Scott Kurtovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Blanchard v. Superintendent Andrews, et al
as 10-3709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO L. BLANCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ANDREWS, D. HOWELL, Chief #117, CAPTAIN DARCY and others
McClellan v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv01754
Plaintiff:
Ron McClellan
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvador Gordienz, Dorothy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 56 Fringe Benefit Fund v. Dugco, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00438
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 56 Fringe Benefit Fund and Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen Local 56 Fringe Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Dugco, Inc., Belinda Howell and William D. Howell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blanchard v. Andrews et al
as 1:2008cv05037
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Blanchard
Defendant:
Superintendent Andrews, D. Howell, Captain Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
