Cases 1 - 10 of 4,365
Davis v. Lutheran Social Services et al
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Clara Marie Davis
Defendant:
Lutheran Social Services, Brenda Hoeper, Sara Sanderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marvin Davis v. Warden, New Castle Correctional Facility
as 24-1707
Petitioner:
MARVIN J. DAVIS
Respondent:
WARDEN, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04956
Plaintiff:
Sibylline Davis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow-Davis v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Teresa Snow-Davis
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Mako Surgical Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
