Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Cuello Ferreras v. Warden of FCI Oxford
as 2:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
Herpis Cuello Ferreras
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Ramon Flores
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Alward v. FCI Oxford et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Defendant:
FCI Oxford, Lt Broesch and Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orji, Michael v. Warden, FCI Oxford et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Petitioner:
Michael Afram Orji
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Oxford and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ozuna v. Rosenberg
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Carlos P. Ozuna
Respondent:
FCI Oxford, Warden and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lambert v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Mario Lambert
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
