Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dawson v. County Of McHenry et al
as 3:2024cv50124
Plaintiff:
Philip J Dawson
Defendant:
County Of McHenry, City of Woodstock, Deputy Caitlynn Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50309
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Dawson
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Tarry Williams, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magana v. Dawson
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Maria Magana
Defendant:
Derek J Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
James Garner v. Sheriff Key, et al
as 22-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF KEY, Lake County, (Badge #488), PEGGY KATONA, Lake County Treasurer, RICHARD J. DAWSON, Attorney and others
James Garner v. Peggy Katona, et al
as 22-2495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
PEGGY KATONA, JOHN PETALAS, RICHARD J. DAWSON and others
James Garner v. Thomas McDermott, et al
as 21-3310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MCDERMOTT, LIA DAWSON, RICHARD J. DAWSON and others
Stanbridge v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2018cv04206
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sandra Simpson, J Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Stanbridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent v. Tilden et al
as 1:2017cv01397
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Riliwan Ojelade, James R Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00759
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Dawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Restaurants 2000 LLC v. K&R Properties LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00394
Defendant:
K&R Properties LLC and William J Dawson
Plaintiff:
Restaurants 2000 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
