Cases 1 - 10 of 65
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. MIDWEST PSYCHOLOGICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
MIDWEST PSYCHOLOGICAL CENTER and JENNFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Demers et al
as 2:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harris and Carl T Harris
Defendant:
Sgt Kyle Demers, CO II Nathan Pach, Cpt Robert Rymarkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Greil
as 2:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Harris
Defendant:
Captain Greil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clott, Marvin et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Clott, Darryle Clott, Richard K. Thomas and others
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
HARRIS v. DUBLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT. et al
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
DUBLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT., DAN WICKER, LYNDON WICKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Edmond Harris
as 23-1414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDMOND J. HARRIS
HARRIS v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
LARRY KUHN, VICTOR GUARISCO, HALEY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2021cv02820
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS and CHRIS RADICAN
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, VICTOR GUARISCO and RON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lucas
as 2:2021cv01124
Petitioner:
Rickey J Harris, III
Respondent:
Earnell Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
