Cases 1 - 10 of 4,664
TAN v. TRUSTGHQ et al
as 1:2024cv05189
Plaintiff:
TAYFUN TAN
Defendant:
TRUSTGHQ, JANE DOE, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hendricks et al v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03163
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks and Justin Snow
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Nestor Medina
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Felicia Adkins, Dr J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waddle v. Kosciusko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Gage Waddle
Defendant:
Kosciusko County Sheriff, Sgt. Dan Mesa, Jake Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant:
DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vine, Christopher v. Dotson, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Vine
Defendant:
Michael Dotson, CO Morales, Lt. Nash and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Tara Goins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
