Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Brunner et al v. Classic Homes By Kuba Ltd et al
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff: Bonnie Brunner and David Brunner
Defendant: Classic Homes By Kuba, Ltd., James F Kubasta and Brenda M Kubasta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Palmer v. Rex Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02087
Plaintiff: James T Palmer and James F Palmer
Defendant: Rex Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Droege v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02066
Plaintiff: James F. Droege
Defendant: Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Noel, Jr. v. Ron Neal
as 23-1406
Applicant: JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Respondent: RON NEAL
WELKA v. LANCASTER et al
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: ROBERT WELKA
Defendant: JAMES F. LANCASTER and MIDWEST LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
James Noel, Jr. v. Indiana Metro Police Department, et al
as 22-2724
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and others
James Noel, Jr. v. Ron Neal
as 22-2618
Applicant: JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Respondent: RON NEAL
NOEL v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01771
Petitioner: JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Respondent: INDIANA STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linder v. Williams
as 3:2022cv50139
Petitioner: James F. Linder
Respondent: Terry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craig Billie, et al v. Village of Channahon, et al
as 22-1660
Plaintiff / Appellant: CRAIG BILLIE, SARA DELUCIO, JANET HOPMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON, JOSEPH N. COOK, JR., EDWARD S. DOLEZAL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?