Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Afroman Music et al v. ZRD, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv03570
Plaintiff:
Afroman Music, Best Coffee in Town, Prescription Songs and others
Defendant:
ZRD, L.L.C. and Alex Zupancic
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Richard Schreiber, et al v. Green Bay Police Department, et al
as 22-3119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD J. SCHREIBER, L. S., L. E. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN BAY POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOES
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co v. 800K LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00403
Defendant:
WEX INC AS ASSIGNEE OF REMY EXPRESS LLC, LINK TRANSPORT INC, WEX FLEET ONE AS ASSIGNEE OF ACTION LOGISTICS and others
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
SCRUGGS v. WILSON et al
as 2:2019cv00228
Defendant:
C. M. RINEHART, WILSON, T. D. TURNER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARK MCCLESKEY et al v. L. E. CECIL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2014cv00747
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
L. E. CECIL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
L E Johnson Products Inc v. Southeastern Wholesale Corporation
as 3:2008cv00300
Plaintiff:
L E Johnson Products Inc
Defendant:
Southeastern Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Griffin v. Circuit Court Criminal Division et al
as 2:2007cv01118
Plaintiff:
Willie D Griffin
Defendant:
Circuit Court Criminal Division, L E Pierce, P T McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
