Cases 1 - 10 of 20,930
MPC et al v. Racine County et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
MPC and CMC
Defendant:
Racine County, Jalee Banach, Hope Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeffrey D. Dahl and Kristin L. Dahl, as Co-Trustees of the Dahl Family Revocable Trust, Dated September 27, 2019 v. DeBriyn, James
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Dahl and Kristin L. Dahl, as Co-Trustees of the Dahl Family Revocable Trust, Dated September 27, 2019
Defendant:
James DeBriyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mosley v. USA
as 3:2024cv01326
Petitioner:
Danyahle L. Mosley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gines v. Dearmond
as 3:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Cordell L. Gines
Defendant:
A. Dearmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pisarski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Pisarski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kelley v. Boneparth et al
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
David Kelley
Defendant:
Peter Boneparth, Wendy Arlin, Michael J. Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Harmon v. ABC 2 News Station et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Larry L Harmon
Defendant:
ABC 2 News Station, wbay.com, Green Bay Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Turner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Steven L Turner
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
