Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker-Hall v. Ribault et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Donovan L Walker-Hall
Defendant:
Dr Justin S Ribault, RN McCollum, HSU Manager Kristin Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Derksen v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY C. DERKSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, FOND DU LAC COUNTY, WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS and others
Derksen v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Roy Charles Derksen
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Fond du Lac County, Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis Walker v. Dan Cromwell
as 23-2240
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS L. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
WADE L. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Weinman et al
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
De'Von L Walker
Defendant:
Robert Weinman, Cheryl Jean-Pierre, Jane Doe Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. ARMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
ARMARK FOOD SERVICES, FRANK VANIHEL, CHRIS HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. GILSTRAP et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
DAVID GILSTRAP, FAUST, JACKIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trepania, Trent v. Izzard, Matt et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Trent Tyler Trepania
Defendant:
Matt Izzard, Stacy Minter, L. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
