Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lilley v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08255
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Lilley
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation,, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lilley, Jeffrey v. Matthews, John et al
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lilley
Defendant:
Wood County, John Matthews, Derek Phillippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FENWICK v. GOFFINET et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BRANHAM, LUCY GOFFINET, BERTH HIRT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FENWICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FENWICK v. GOFFINET et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
AMY MCMANGWAY, KATHLEEN BRANHAM, BETH HIRT and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW W. FENWICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Flowers v. CO Collins et al
as 1:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Hassan Flowers
Defendant:
CO Collins, CO Webb, John Edward Coumbe-Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lilley v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2017cv06805
Plaintiff:
Peggy Lilley
Defendant:
Lee Schwartz, Kevin Schwartz and Wm. Schwartz & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jackson et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company et al
as 1:2013cv00633
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Jackson , Anne Caffyn , Michael Caffyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
