Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mason v. Hill Correctional Center
as 4:2023cv04222
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Defendant:
Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Mickey Gibb
as 23-2930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICKEY GIBB
Mickey v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12408
Plaintiff:
DENISE MICKEY
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mickey et al v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07398
Plaintiff:
MeShawn Mickey and Derick Mickey
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Dabur International, Ltd., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wisnefski v. Mickey Group Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04984
Plaintiff:
Michael Wisnefski
Defendant:
Mickey Group Inc. and Alex Rabens
Interpleader:
Hampton Lumber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Fort v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv50265
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Isiah Fort
Defendant:
Lindsey Harris, Mickey Gates, Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Russell v. Branch
as 1:2023cv04384
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Brandon Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Bogle et al
as 1:2023cv03682
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Michelle Bogle, Kris Bogle, Hasina Javed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Exum v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Mickey T Exum
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
