Cases 1 - 10 of 172
MIDDLETON v. DAVID et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
JASON MIDDLETON
Defendant:
DAVID and MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
MIDDLETON v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Lush, Stephen v. Burns, Lorie et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Lorie Burns, Middleton Police Department, Steven Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARRA v. CREAR et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
GERMAN PARRA
Defendant:
CREAR, BOSTOCK, SPAYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq03174
Plaintiff:
James Middleton and Judy Middleton
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Middleton v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv08637
Plaintiff:
Myoshia Middleton
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Middleton v. Mead Johnson & Company et al
as 1:2023cv05880
Plaintiff:
Melissa Middleton
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company and MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephen Lush v. Lawrence Bechler, et al
as 23-2666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE E. BECHLER, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHELLE SCHWARTZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
