Cases 1 - 10 of 16
VELA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
RENE VELA
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, WVCF PLANT MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BESECKER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BESECKER
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, BRANDON REARDON, COLTON MCPHEETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BESECKER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BESECKER
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, B. REARDON, ZACHARY SCHAEFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Reardon v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00701
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Manufacturing Corp, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reardon v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Incorporated
as 2:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reardon
Defendant:
Short-Elliott Hendrickson, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CRITTENDEN v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2016cv00467
Plaintiff:
JAMES CRITTENDEN
Defendant:
J. DOUGHTY, CHRIS HEFFNER, S. HUMERICKHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SORRELL, et al. v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
as 1:2016mc00023
Petitioner:
HARRY L. CHEN, JAMES B. REARDON, PETER E. SHUMLIN and others
Respondent:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
