Cases 1 - 10 of 34
SEARCY v. CLAY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
GARY SEARCY
Defendant:
INDIANA * CLAY COUNTY, CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rivera Diaz et al v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reedy, Sylvester Thomas, Antonio Brooks and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, Cpt William Dokert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Crystal M. Searcy
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McDole v. J. E. T., Inc. of Searcy et al
as 1:2019cv01244
Defendant:
J. E. T., Inc. of Searcy and Blake Lercher
Plaintiff:
John McDole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEARCY v. PATEL et al
as 1:2018cv00474
Defendant:
HARSHAD PATEL, NEISHA PATEL and UJ CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
NANCY SEARCY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Corey Searcy
as 17-2101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COREY D. SEARCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Searcy
as 1:2016cv06488
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward Searcy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARGILL INCORPORATED v. SEARCY FARMS et al
as 1:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
CARGILL INCORPORATED
Defendant:
J. DANIEL SEARCY and SEARCY FARMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
