Land Condemnation Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Lounsbury et al
as 4:2023cv00279
Plaintiff: Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant: Benjamin Lee Lounsbury, Jean Ann Lounsbury, Big Run Farms, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Easement and Right-of-Way Across 33.523 acres more or less, located in Lot 1, Block 1 Steeple View 2d Addition, Scott County, Minnesota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv01906
Plaintiff: Northern Natural Gas Co.
Defendant: Easement and Right-of-Way Across 33.523 acres more or less, located in Lot 1, Block 1 Steeple View 2d Addition, Scott County, Minnesota, Aaron Le, Lan Le and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America v. 0.55 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of St. Louis, Missouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01050
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Liberty Plaza, LLC, Town & Country Bank, Mark Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Triangle Warehouse, Inc. et al v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02305
Plaintiff: Triangle Warehouse, Inc., Benchmark Logistics, LLC and Cue Properties, LLC
Defendant: City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 0.028 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Sebastian County, Arkansas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02049
Defendant: Prairie Land Holdings, LLC, Tax Assessor Zach Johnson and 0.028 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Sebastian County, Arkansas
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 5.84 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Defendant: Karen Sue Eggert Inman, Judy J. Worlitz, 1.40 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.57 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00086
Defendant: 0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.57 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of West Alton and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant: 1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.87 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Sara Stahlschmidt and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.98 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01848
Defendant: Donna Kaufmann and William W. Kaufmann as Trustees of the William W. Kaufmann and Donna Kaufmann Trust Dated May 4, 2017, Karla J. Machens Trust Dated March 10, 1995, 0.60 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 4.25 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01850
Defendant: 2.18 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, 4.25 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?