Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Lahart v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2015cv00464
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lahart
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Newhoff et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Darlee Newhoff and Jacqueline Newhoff
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Logistics, LLC , John Doe 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2015cv00212
Plaintiff:
Nancy Brian
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayling et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 2:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Robin E. Ayling and Corey J. Ayling
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Zeta Rho Corporation and Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Walter Pruitt
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cattanach v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC
as 0:2013cv01664
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Cattanach
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC and BNSF Railway Company
Tami Skrovig v. BNSF Railway Company
as 13-1344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tami Skrovig, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Jeffrey Skrovig, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
BNSF Railway Company, a Delaware corporation
Neill v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 5:2012cv06048
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Charles K. Sullivan , Mike T. Rubyor and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Neill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al v. Shelter et al
as 4:2012cv03047
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Lapp, Gerald Shetler and W-L Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2011cv01436
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Alexander
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Randy R. McQueary and St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
