Cases 71 - 80 of 19,808
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephan L Marshall
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Paul Wilson
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stanley v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Eric Stanley
Respondent:
State of Iowa, Iowa District Court, Keokuk County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Milstead et al
as 4:2024cv04094
Petitioner:
Darrian Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Milstead and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hecker v. Brewer
as 5:2024cv06065
Petitioner:
Aaron Hecker
Respondent:
Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broady v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daryl M Broady
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Henderson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frazier Todd, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCullough v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Alvin McCullough
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
