Cases 111 - 120 of 186
Wedmore v. Jorgenson et al
as 1:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Wedmore
Defendant:
Brian Jorgenson, Robyn Schmalenberger, Brian Weigel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. McDonald et al
as 4:2014cv04155
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Ashley McDonald, Tim Meirose, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tutson v. Lincoln et al
as 4:2014cv00382
Defendant:
Rick Lincoln, Craig Eberhart, Joe Steffens and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald M. Tutson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Mercer, County of et al
as 1:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Scott Robert Wilson
Defendant:
Mercer, County of, Cynthia Feland and Jessica J. Binder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Voight et al
as 4:2014cv04111
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
William Voight, Jeremy Wendling, Samuel Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olafson v. Bertsch et al
as 3:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Olafson
Defendant:
Leann K. Bertsch, Donald Redmen, Jessica Wiltkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Hot Springs County Jail et al
as 6:2014cv06061
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dean Morrison
Defendant:
Amy Martin and Jessica Rash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Lincoln County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv00860
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Franklin
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Tonya Drummond and Unknown Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
