Cases 11 - 20 of 916
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bell v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Brian Foley, Kelly Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levac v. Haney et al
as 6:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill, Sheriff Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levac v. Haney et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney, Travis Hill, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Junior Robinson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kennedy
Defendant:
White County, Arkansas, Phillip Miller, Clayton Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Titus v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
