Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Buomkuoth Well v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-2212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Fifth Judicial District, Christopher Rovney and others
Well v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Fifth Judicial District, Christopher Rowney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Garland et al
as 0:2021cv01191
Defendant:
Lt. Gilbertson, Chad Orum, S. Kallis and others
Plaintiff:
Clement David King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv06163
Plaintiff:
Angela Kirkland and Tabitha Clements
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne Precythe and Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Russell v. Lewis et al
as 4:2017cv01981
Plaintiff:
Forrest Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven Eric Lewis, St. Louis County Public Defenders Office, Donald E. Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemingway v. Hill et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Lamon Taneal Hemingway, Sr.
Defendant:
Nina Hill, Kimberly Delisle, Micheal Loomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemingway v. Reed et al
as 1:2016cv00220
Plaintiff:
Lamon Taneal Hemingway, Sr.
Defendant:
Paula Reed, Timothy Seabaugh, George Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckermann v. Babich et al
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Beckermann
Defendant:
Glen Babich, John Eppolito, Jason Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Yang v. MO Dept of Corrections, et al
as 15-2231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Yang
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi, Director, MDOC, John Doe and others
Clements v. Young et al
as 4:2015cv04043
Plaintiff:
Terrance Clements
Defendant:
Darin Young, Mary Carpenter, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
