Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Aaron v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kameon V Aaron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Marshall Reed, Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox III v. Sather et al
as 0:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Sara Johnson, John Grey, Ebenezer Tope Adebara and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Maddox III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirtle v. Bullock et al
as 4:2018cv02101
Defendant:
Ray Foot, Trent Franklin, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ray Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Achter v. Sheriff et al
as 4:2017cv02231
Plaintiff:
Leslie Allen Achter
Defendant:
Unknown Sheriff, Circuit Court Judge and Sandy Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Endicott et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Franklin G. Endicott and Craig Dawdy
Defendant:
Larry Allen, Troy Bartley, Frank Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbrook v. Barber et al
as 4:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Halbrook
Defendant:
Tyler Barber, Sandy Huckabee, John Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Caldwell v. Sandy Conway, et al
as 16-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Caldwell
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandy Conway, CCM II, Crawford, Lieutenant, Francis, COI Property and others
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
