Cases 51 - 60 of 194
Noyola v. Stiles et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Emilio Noyola
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Stiles, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Does Other Agencies of United States of America; Doctor Krystal, Amanda Granger and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowles v. D.O.C.R. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Shaun Fode, Steve Bement, Dave Roggenbuck and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Reyes Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Norwood et al
as 1:2019cv01016
Defendant:
Mindy Ingram, Doug Norwood, Cameron Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hendricks et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Hendricks, T Carter, Rosalez and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Brooke Boyles, Hendricks, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2018cv03366
Plaintiff:
Samuel T Turner, Sr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Wieder and Creech
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tenerelli v. United States of America et al
as 0:2018cv00629
Defendant:
United States of America, The and Lon Krieg
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Tenerelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John MacInnis v. United States
as 18-1268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Kemp MacInnis, Reg #08355-029
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Cotner v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02012
Petitioner:
Robert Cotner
Respondent:
United States of America and Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
