Cases 1 - 10 of 66
USA v. Cerno
as 6:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Cerno
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al v. Grimlie et al
as 4:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Pruco Securities, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Grimlie, Peter Siegling, Matthew Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Courtney
as 6:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Courtney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
GG/MG, Inc. et al v. Midwest Regional Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
GG/MG, Inc. doing business as Landfill Equipment, Danielle M. Emert, Angela M. Mueller and others
Defendant:
Midwest Regional Bank and U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Orso v. Ridgell
as 2:2022mc00066
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Dorado P. Ridgell
Garnishee:
Regions Bank, Simmons Bank and Bank of America, N.A.
Orso v. Kendrix
as 2:2022mc00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Clarise Kendrix
Garnishee:
Arvest Bank
Friederichs v. Sanford Health
as 3:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew G. Friederichs, M.D.
Defendant:
Sanford Health
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rickey et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Rickey and Augustus M. Rickey
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corp doing business as Toyota Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.