Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and Gun Owners Foundation
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Steven M. Dettelbach and others
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, March for Our Lives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CityLine Partnership, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
CityLine Partnership, L.L.C. doing business as Southside Pawn
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
State of Arizona, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Gary M. Restaino and others
Petitioner:
Prosecutors Against Gun Violence
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Jonathan Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rare Breed Triggers, LLC v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rare Breed Triggers, LLC
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smalley v. Becerra
as 4:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
David L. Smalley
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Amicus Curiae:
American Association of Bioanalysts
Interested Party:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Blackmoon et al v. United States Department of Justice, The et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jody Blackmoon, Terry Hodgkiss and William Lefthand, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, The and United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
