Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Wynn et al v. Newton
as 4:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Wynn, Theodore Black and Kiara Withers
Defendant:
David Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Eberhardt v. Cheyenne Ridge Outfitters & Lodge, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Eberhardt, II
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Ridge Outfitters & Lodge, Inc.
Defendant:
High Adventure Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Nikki Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newton v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
April Newton
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company, John Does and Carlos Marldon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Newton v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02497
Plaintiff:
Newton Michael and Michael Newton
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Newton v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Thomas Newton
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Baker et al v. Mallinckrodt LLC. et al
as 4:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Beverly Scholfield, Jacqueline Newton, Jessica Baker and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT LLC., Cotter Corp. and Mallinckrodt LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newton-Handy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv02921
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mario Newton-Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02065
Plaintiff:
Philip Arnold, Joel Welty, Ricky Turner and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
