Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Timmons v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rosa Timmons
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Hagan v. New Leaf Landscape, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael F Hagan
Defendant:
New Leaf Landscape, LLC and Irving Rodriguez Rosa
Rosas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Manuel II E. Rosas and Manuel E. Rosas, II
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hammonds et al v. Thind et al
as 2:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michele Hammonds
Defendant:
Khushdeep Singh Thind, 2320959 Ontario Inc doing business as JMD Express, Ronnie Hooper, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02286
Plaintiff:
Justin Abner, Jesus Alvarez, James Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
De La Rosa et al v. Gardner Global Logistics et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Elvia De La Rosa, Sergio De La Rosa, Armando De La Rosa and others
Defendant:
Garner Global Logistics, Gardner Trucking Inc and Gardner Global Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
Karen Fattal, Misty Rose Elliott, Tonia Fraizer and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Royston, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
