Cases 21 - 30 of 37,657
Cruzen v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Shirley Cruzen
Defendant:
Bill Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fly v. Woodcock et al
as 6:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fly
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Woodcock and Christian County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Clark v. Hartmann et al
as 4:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
Klaus Hartmann, Brittani E. Lewit, Kristi Egger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
