Cases 31 - 40 of 38,372
McCoy v. Hot Springs Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv06125
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police, Office of the Prosecutor, Hot Springs Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Tana McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. The Wendy's Company et al
as 4:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Haza Foods LLC and The Wendy's Company
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rued et al v. Webber
as 0:2024cv03662
Defendant:
Charles Webber
Plaintiff:
W.O.R. and Joseph Daryll Rued
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Loggins v. Relianse ND LLC
as 1:2024cv00187
Defendant:
Relianse ND LLC doing business as Motel 6
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Loggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Yousif v. Christensen et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Defendant:
Sarah Crane, Susan Larson Christensen, P. J. Badding and others
Plaintiff:
Hussein Yousif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
