Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Woodworth v. Hulshof et al
as 5:2014cv06090
Defendant:
Kenneth Hulshof, Lyndel Robertson, Rochelle Koehly and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Woodworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarasenko v. University of Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
Olga Tarasenko
Defendant:
University of Arkansas , University of Arkansas Board of Trustees , Jim von Gremp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yankton v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Roger Yankton, Sr.
Defendant:
Ruth Hopkins , Leander McDonald , Mardell Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Tribal Habeas Corpus
Ballard v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
(I')sla Ballard
Defendant:
State of Missouri, City of St. Louis, Nathaniel Burkemper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West v. Brankel et al
as 6:2013cv03237
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Renee West
Defendant:
Gary Don Brankel , Robert Allen Carter , Clarence Henry Liberty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Howard et al v. Arkansas Children's Hospital et al
as 4:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Pam Howard and Eben Howard
Defendant:
Arkansas Children's Hospital , Ron Robertson and Jon Bates
Movant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
(I')sla Ballard v. State of Missouri, et al
as 13-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
(I)sla Ballard Ballard
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, City of St. Louis, Nathaniel Burkemper, Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
