Cases 71 - 80 of 37,657
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Krisit Putman, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Bolton et al
as 6:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Gary Taylor
Defendant:
Taylor Bolton, Steven Hartman and City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Byers v. May et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byers
Defendant:
Brendan May, John Does and Augusta, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rejistre v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rejistre
Defendant:
Adam Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Thompson, et al
as 6:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Leticia Roberts
Defendant:
Tony Thompson and Black Hawk County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Seelig v. Ramsey County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seelig
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Minnesota, Inmate Services Corporation, Rogeric Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
