Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Titus v. Rihanna, et al
as 6:2024cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rihanna, Nikki Minaj, Eminem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Private Entities Definitions
Jones Digital LLC v. Arkansas County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jones Digital LLC
Defendant:
Arkansas County, Arkansas, Thomas Best, Johnny Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Best v. United States
as 4:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Timothy Best
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Turner v. Eagan Best Buy et al
as 0:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Turner
Defendant:
Eagan Best Buy, Eagan Police Department, Dane N. Winget and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Derrick Turner v. City of Eagan Police Dept., et al
as 22-1786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick Devon Turner
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Eagan Police Department, Best Buy Stores, L.P. and City of Eagan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Quinn v. Department of Justice
as 4:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office, Royal Motel, Intercontinental Sait Paul Riverfront Hotel and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Eagan Police Department et al
as 0:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Turner
Defendant:
City of Eagan, Eagan Police Department and Best Buy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
