Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Doe et al v. Dardanelle School District et al
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Doe
Defendant:
Dardanelle School District, Arthur J Gallagher & Company - Little Rock, Nicholas Rolando Valls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. McGee et al
as 0:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rhodes
Defendant:
Michael McGee, Boyd Beccue, William Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Frank Baptist v. Rodney Chandler
as 22-1718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Frank Baptist
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodney Chandler, in his individual capacity
Baptist v. Chandler
as 4:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
Frank Baptist
Defendant:
Rodney Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv01443
Plaintiff:
Travis Robinson
Defendant:
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis, Missouri , Ronald Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brann v. Garland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2016cv06075
Plaintiff:
Travis Brann
Defendant:
Garland County Sheriff's Department , Lane Mayo , Charles Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
