Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Sanford v. Eli Hobbs, et al
as 5:2024cv05057
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Sanford
Defendant:
Eli Hobbs, Brad Robinson, Washington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2967
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DSI Medical, L.L.C. et al v. Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
DSI Medical, L.L.C., Damon Frost and Shannon Wooldridge
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Dawson et al
as 4:2019cv00382
Plaintiff:
Damon Davis, Crysteal Davis and Iisha Hillmon
Defendant:
Dana Wingert, Ross Klein, City of Des Moines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Sondrol v. McKenzie County et al
as 1:2019cv00245
Plaintiff:
Damon Mitchell Sondrol
Defendant:
McKenzie County Correctional Center, Shaun Schatz, Jonathan Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Street et al v. O'Toole et al
as 4:2019cv02590
Defendant:
Jeremiah Koerper, Jeffrey Long, Nick Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Fudail McCain, Ashley Theis, Ronald Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye, Jr. v. City of Independence, Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00135
Defendant:
The Buckle, Inc. and City of Independence, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Damon Dye, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Griffith v. Hardin-Central C-2 School District et al
as 4:2018cv00827
Defendant:
Damon Clodfelter, Hardin-Central C-2 School District and Erica McBee
Plaintiff:
Rayna P. Griffith
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
