Cases 1 - 10 of 18
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. McKelvey et al
as 4:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
Herbert McDaniels
Defendant:
Rick McKelvey, Daniel Watson, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nachbar v. Miller et al
as 6:2012cv03479
Plaintiff:
Carol Nachbar
Defendant:
Allison Miller , City of Springfield Health Department , City of Springfield and others
Counter_claimant:
Jeremy Lynn , Christian Conrad , Phillip Corcoran and others
Counter_defendant:
Carol Nachbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hampton v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv01103
Plaintiff:
Robert Hampton
Defendant:
David Johnson , Mark Griever and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nachbar v. Miller et al
as 6:2012cv03458
Plaintiff:
Carol Nachbar
Defendant:
Allison Miller, City of Springfield Health Department, City of Springfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Johnson v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
as 12-3100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John David Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Attorney, Stephen H. Locher, Asst. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Marshal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
