Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Light v. Missouri Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Light
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CTM Holdings, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 6:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
CTM Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Natural Resources Conservation Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Gene Scott v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Scott v. US Department of Agriculture
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
US Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Proctor v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Helen Proctor
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack, USDA Rural Development, Michael Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Scott II v. US Department of Agriculture
as 4:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott II
Defendant:
US Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wisdom et al v. ElShohly et al
as 2:2020cv04255
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Dr. David D Allen, Food and Drug Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Adela Dawnise Wisdom and Victoria Rose Mindiola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
