Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Grant v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Defendant:
Ismael Clay, Cecil Langston, Jason Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lenear v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lenear
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, The, McLeod County, Officer Tyler Bruns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garang v. City of Ames et al
as 4:2018cv00270
Defendant:
B. McPherson, J. Congdon, D. Johnsen and others
Plaintiff:
Ngong Kaw Garang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McPherson County et al
as 3:2018cv03008
Plaintiff:
Deborah Davis
Defendant:
McPherson County, DCI State Police, Dave Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Everett v. McPherson Prison
as 4:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rochelle Everett
Defendant:
McPherson Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamela Montgomery v. City of Ames, et al
as 15-1540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tamela Montgomery
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Ames, Suzanne Owens, individually and in her official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer for the City of Ames Police Department, Heath Ropp, individually and in his official capacity as a Law Enforcement Officer for the City of Ames Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
