Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dudley v. Freedman et al
as 4:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Judge W. Autrey, Matt Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerran et al v. City of Ferguson et al
as 4:2024cv00843
Defendant:
Marquis Jones, John Doe and City of Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Kwan Scott, Lena Rogers, Javon Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dudley v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, State Trooper Jacob Meadows, State of Arkansas Headquarters Troop 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
Karanya-Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Arkansas Insurance Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Brumfield v. Brumfield
as 6:2020cv02050
Defendant:
Sharra Roshell Brumfield
Plaintiff:
Marquis Dushan Brumfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miller v. Custom Tree and Lawn Service Inc
as 4:2008cv01722
Plaintiff:
Marquis Miller and Custom Tree and Lawn Service Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
