Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Marilyn Norwood v. FBI, et al
as 22-2453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marilyn McCoy Norwood
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Secret Service, Little Rock Police Department and others
Hicks v. Norwood
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Johnathon S. Hicks and Bryce's Bail Bonds, Inc.
Defendant:
David Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norwood v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Marilyn McCoy Norwood
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Secret Service, Little Rock Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Deluca et al
as 1:2021cv01010
Defendant:
David Norwood and Dr. Joseph Deluca
Plaintiff:
Wremburen Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanGelder v. Helget et al
as 0:2020cv02327
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Simon Trautmann and Kate Graham
Defendant:
City of Norwood Young America, Steven Helget and Norwood Young America
Plaintiff:
Mark VanGelder
Consolidated Defendant:
Justin Templin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
