Cases 11 - 20 of 1,368
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Eric B. Dorsey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Michael B Webb, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Wattleton v. Krage
as 0:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
B. Krage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
