Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Carter v. USA et al
as 4:2010cv01533
Plaintiff:
Seno Carter
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Bustillo et al
as 6:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John Doe, Michael K Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foshie v. Lappin et al
as 6:2010cv03317
Plaintiff:
Randall Foshie
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Marty Anderson, Beth Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donnelly v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 0:2010cv03105
Petitioner:
Kevin Phillips Donnelly
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The , Harley Lappin and Scott P. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Foshie v. Lappin et al
as 6:2010cv03288
Plaintiff:
Randall Foshie
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Marty Anderson, Beth Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Anderson et al
as 6:2010cv03289
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Marty Anderson, C Nicklin, Jeff E Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fast Horse v. O'Bama et al
as 5:2010cv05037
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fast Horse
Respondent:
Barrack hussein O'Bama, Karen Edenfield, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rudolph Stanko, etc. v. Ricardo Rios, etc., et al
as 09-2338
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudolph George Stanko, and on behalf of prisoners imprisoned with the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Respondent - Appellee:
Ricardo Rios, local director/warden, Michael K. Nelley, regional director and Harley Lappin, national director
Williams v. Lappin et.al.,
as 6:2009cv03185
Plaintiff:
Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Richard Schott, Lisa Sunderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rudy Stanko v. Ricardo Rios, et al
as 09-2258
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudolph George Stanko
Respondent - Appellee:
Ricardo Rios, Local Director/Warden, Harley Lappin, Director and Michael Nalley, Regional Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
