Cases 11 - 20 of 129
Perales v. Hart
as 0:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Perales
Defendant:
Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hart v. Collins et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Darrey L Hart
Defendant:
Barbara Collins and ADC Centralized Trust Funds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. Daniels et al
as 0:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Perales
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoosman v. Dryer et al
as 6:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Cornell A Hoosman
Defendant:
Andrea Dryer, Kelly Ann Lekar, Quentin Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Perkins v. Jack Daniels, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor Perkins
Defendant / Appellee:
Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist and Dionne Hart, Staff Psychiatrist
Becerra v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv02065
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America, FMC Rochester Prison Officials, Staff, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lexie Williams v. Morgen, et al
as 22-2659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lexie Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
Doctor Morgen, Medical Doctors/Medical Staff; Medical Doctor, Doctor Klein, Medical Doctor/Medical Staff; Psychology/Psychiatry Departments and Doctor Hart, Medical Doctor/Medical Staff; Psychology/Psychiatry Departments
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nault-Hart v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
James Nault-Hart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
