Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Frederick Banks v. Timothy Outlaw, et al
as 12-2538
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy C. Outlaw, Johnson, Cuccio, Dr., FCI-Forrest City and others
Banks v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy C Outlaw, Johnson, Cuccio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peone v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Everett T Peone
Defendant:
USA, United States Bureau of Prisons, Hipolito Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Aviant et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Aviant, United States Bureau of Prisons and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 12-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Commissioner and Director, Department of Interior, Secretary, Eric Holder, Department of Justice and others
Williams v. Forrest City Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Henry A Williams
Defendant:
Forrest City Medical Center, United States Bureau of Prisons and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Keating, Jr. v. Gene Smith, et al
as 12-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Keating, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Gene Smith, M.D., Larry Doyle, Jail Administrator, Lincoln County Jail, Dan Torres, Sheriff, Lincoln County Sheriff's Department and others
Young v. Does et al
as 2:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
David M Young
Defendant:
John Does and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. United States et al
as 0:2011cv00954
Plaintiff:
Tariq Belt
Defendant:
United States and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
