Cases 21 - 30 of 2,417
Clyde Johnson, II v. United States, et al
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Stephanie Swords, Doctor, USMCFP, Collins, Doctor, USMCFP and others
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Anthony Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Justice v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
James Jackson, Gary Edward Johnson, Jimmy Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Potter v. St. Charles County, et al
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Damien Ford v. J. Lee, et al
as 24-1441
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Defendant:
J. Lee, Sergeant, Sims, Sergeant, Tucker Max Unit, Taylor, Correctional Officer and others
Dale Williams, Sr. v. Nancy Moore, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Moore, Sara Kulas, MSOP--Moose Lake Group Supervisor Special Services, Samantha J. Suhonen, MSOP--Moose Lake mailroom personnel and others
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixson v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Antonio Dixson
Respondent:
Lt. Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
