Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Dehart v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dehart
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden, Forrest City- Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Romero v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ali Romero
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden of FCI Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Payne v. Langley et al
as 4:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Payne, III
Defendant:
Langley, Eric Higgins and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansfield v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Richard Mansfield
Defendant:
USA and Does Warden, Forrest City Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Lowe, Sr. v. Commissioner Paul Schnell
as 22-2410
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Carlton Lowe, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections
Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson, et al
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Claudia Harris, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mitchell Johnson, Jr., Captain, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Michael Lowe, Sr. v. Commissioner Paul Schnell
as 22-2220
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Carlton Lowe, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections
Jody Goldsberry v. John Yates
as 22-2175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jody Goldsberry
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCI Forrest City Low
Lowe v. Schnell
as 0:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
Michael Carlton Lowe
Respondent:
Commissioner Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. Schnell
as 4:2022cv00524
Petitioner:
Michael Carlton Lowe
Respondent:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
