Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Williams v. Palmer et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - THE LEAD CASE TO DOCKET IN IS C12-4086DEO
as 5:2013cv04052
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Matthew Royster, Bob Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes et al v. Darrow et al
as 4:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Grimes, Ralph Weaver and Bobby D Williams
Defendant:
Darrow and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Owens et al
as 2:2013cv02012
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Williams
Defendant:
Dale Owens and Johnny Spickelmier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Brenda, DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections, Michelle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roller v. Zoldessy et al
as 5:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Roller
Defendant:
Martin Zoldessy, Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Palmer et al
as 5:2012cv04045
Plaintiff:
Harold D Williams
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Jason Smith, Mike Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Williams v. Artis Ray Hobb
as 12-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phillip D. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Artis Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Rodney Williams v. David White, et al
as 12-1215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rodney D. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
David White, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Joanna Z. Franklin, Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction, Robert Clark, Hearing Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Williams v. Earls
as 4:2011cv01985
Petitioner:
Craig D. Williams
Respondent:
Alan Earls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Hobbs
as 5:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Williams
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
