Cases 31 - 40 of 3,220
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner:
Calvin Hutson
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Olivette Products
as 4:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Olivette Products
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jared Williams v. David Vandergriff
as 24-1620
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams
Defendant:
David Vandergriff
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Clowers v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Cameron David Clowers
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Saline County Detention Center and Taylor Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clowers v. Gilliam et al
as 5:2024cv05067
Plaintiff:
Cameron David Clowers
Defendant:
Captain Wade Gilliam, Taylor Beckwith and Saline County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
